Notice: Undefined index: linkPowrot in C:\wwwroot\wwwroot\publikacje\publikacje.php on line 1275
Strona główna > Publikacje
Publikacje
Pomoc (F2)
[51020] Artykuł:

Software package for measurement of quality indicators working in no-reference model

Czasopismo: MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS   Strony: 1-17
ISSN:  1380-7501
Opublikowano: Grudzień 2016
 
  Autorzy / Redaktorzy / Twórcy
Imię i nazwisko Wydział Katedra Procent
udziału		 Liczba
punktów
Jakub Nawała30.00  
Mikołaj Leszczuk30.00  
Michał Zajdel20.00  
Remigiusz Baran orcid logoWEAiIKatedra Informatyki, Elektroniki i Elektrotechniki *2025.00  

Grupa MNiSW:  Publikacja w czasopismach wymienionych w wykazie ministra MNiSzW (część A)
Punkty MNiSW: 25

Pełny tekstPełny tekst     DOI LogoDOI    
Keywords:

QoE  QoS  OTT  No-Reference  Quality assessment  Crowd-sourcing  Content discovery  Metadata enrichment  IMCOP 


Abstract:

The key objective of No-Reference (NR) visual metrics (indicators) is to predict the end-user experience concerning remotely delivered video content. Rapidly increasing demand for easily accessible, high quality video material makes it crucial for service providers to test the user experience without the need for comparison with reference material. In this paper, we present a versatile measurement system and describe various optimisation strategies utilised to reach real-time operation. Furthermore, several calculation automation scripts are described, along with a dedicated graphical user interface, which gives a more comprehensive insight into the presented system. On top of that, we show the results of crowd-sourcing experiments used to estimate subjective threshold values for quality indicators. Additionally, integration with the IMCOP system is introduced.


B   I   B   L   I   O   G   R   A   F   I   A
1. Baran R, Ruść T, Rychlik M (2014) A smart camera for traffic surveillance. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–15. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07569-3_1 Google Scholar
2. Baran R, Zeja A (2015) The imcop system for data enrichment and content discovery and delivery. In: 2015 International conference on computational science and computational intelligence (CSCI), pp 143–146. doi:10.1109/CSCI.2015.137
3. Baran R, Zeja A, Slusarczyk P (2015) An overview of the IMCOP system architecture with selected intelligent utilities emphasized. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 3–17. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26404-2_1 Google Scholar
4. Głowacz A, Grega M, Gwiazda P, Janowski L, Leszczuk M, Romaniak P, Romano SP (2010) Automated qualitative assessment of multi-modal distortions in digital images based on glz. Annals of Telecommunications - Annales des Télécommunications 65(1):3–17. doi:10.1007/s12243-009-0146-6
5. Hoßfeld T, Hirth M, Redi J, Mazza F, Korshunov P, Naderi B, Seufert M, Gardlo B, Egger S, Keimel C (2014) Best practices and recommendations for crowdsourced qoe - lessons learned from the qualinet task force “crowdsourcing”. Lessons learned from the qualinet task force “Crowdsourcing” COST action IC1003 European network on quality of experience in multimedia systems and services (QUALINET). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01078761
6. International Telecommunication Union (1996) ITU-T P.800, Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality. http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-P.800-199608-I
7. International Telecommunication Union (1996) ITU-T P.930, Principles of a reference impairment system for video. http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-P.930-199608-I
8. International Telecommunication Union (2004) ITU-T J.144, Objective perceptual video quality measurement techniques for digital cable television in the presence of a full reference. http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-J.144-200403-I
9. International Telecommunication Union (2008) ITU-T J.246, Perceptual isual quality measurement techniques for multimedia services over digital cable television networks in the presence of a reduced bandwidth reference. http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-J.246-200808-I
10. International Telecommunication Union (2008) ITU-T J.247, Objective perceptual multimedia video quality measurement in the presence of a full reference. http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-J.247-200808-I
11. International Telecommunication Union (2010) ITU-T J.249, Perceptual video quality measurement techniques for digital cable television in the presence of a reduced reference. http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-J.249-201001-I
12. International Telecommunication Union (2011) ITU-T J.341, Objective perceptual multimedia video quality measurement of HDTV for digital cable television in the presence of a full reference. http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-J.341-201101-I
13. International Telecommunication Union (2011) ITU-T J.342, Objective multimedia video quality measurement of HDTV for digital cable television in the presence of a reduced reference signal. http://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-J.342-201104-I
14. International Telecommunication Union (2013) ITU-T P.1202, Parametric non-intrusive bitstream assessment of video media streaming quality. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-P.1202
15. International Telecommunication Union (2014) ITU-T J.343, Hybrid perceptual bitstream models for objective video quality measurements. https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-J.343
16. Janowski L, Papir Z (2009) Modeling subjective tests of quality of experience with a generalized linear model. In: International workshop on quality of multimedia experience, 2009. QoMEx 2009, pp 35–40. doi:10.1109/QOMEX.2009.5246979
17. Leszczuk M (2011) Multimedia communications, services and security. In: 4th international conference, MCSS 2011, krakow, Poland, June 2–3, 2011. Proceedings, chap. assessing task-based video quality — a journey from subjective psycho-physical experiments to objective quality models. Springer, Berlin, pp 91–99. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21512-4_11
18. Leszczuk M, Hanusiak M, Blanco I, Dziech A, Derkacz J, Wyckens E, Borer S (2014) Key indicators for monitoring of audiovisual quality. In: Signal processing and communications applications conference (SIU), 2014 22nd, pp 2301–2305. doi:10.1109/SIU.2014.6830724
19. Leszczuk M, Hanusiak M, Farias MCQ, Wyckens E, Heston G (2014) Recent developments in visual quality monitoring by key performance indicators. Multimedia Tools and Applications:1–23. doi:10.1007/s11042-014-2229-2
20. Li X, Guo Q, Lu X (2016) Spatiotemporal statistics for video quality assessment. IEEE Trans Image Process 25(7):3329–3342. doi:10.1109/TIP.2016.2568752
21. Mitsu (multimedia efficient scalable and robust delivery) (2016). http://mitsu-project.eu/
22. Mu M, Romaniak P, Mauthe A, Leszczuk M, Janowski L, Cerqueira E (2012) Framework for the integrated video quality assessment. Multimedia Tools and Applications 61(3):787–817. doi:10.1007/s11042-011-0946-3
23. Romaniak P, Janowski L, Leszczuk M, Papir Z (2012) Perceptual quality assessment for h.264/avc compression. In: 2012 IEEE consumer communications and networking conference (CCNC), pp 597–602. doi:10.1109/CCNC.2012.6181021
24. Slusarczyk P, Baran R (2014) Piecewise-linear subband coding scheme for fast image decomposition. Multimedia Tools and Applications:1–18. doi:10.1007/s11042-014-2173-1
25. Søgaard J, Tavakoli S, Brunnström K, García N (2016) Subjective analysis and objective characterization of adaptive bitrate videos. In: IS&T international symposium on electronic imaging 2016: image quality and system performance XIII
26. Video quality (2016). http://vq.kt.agh.edu.pl
27. Vime flickr dataset (2015). https://www.flickr.com/groups/vime/
28. Vqeg moavi project (2016). http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/vqeg/projects/moavi/moavi.aspx
29. Zhu K, Li C, Asari V, Saupe D (2015) No-reference video quality assessment based on artifact measurement and statistical analysis. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 25(4):533–546. doi:10.1109/TCSVT.2014.2363737

POWRÓT
Strona główna > Publikacje